You may have noticed last week one particular post here received quite a bit of attention. On February 6th, Five Things To Do With A PC When You Have No Internet Connection was submitted to Digg. I didn’t submit the story, but I did notice a small influx of traffic coming that afternoon and evening. When I checked my stats at around 3 a.m. on the 7th, there were over 17,000 referrals from Digg. The piece had been made popular at shortly after midnight CST. So I checked Digg and saw that the story had over 500 Diggs. The odyssey had begun.
First, let me say that when you first see the traffic flooding in from Digg that it’s hard not to simply sit there and keep refreshing your stats. Then it is hard not to keep refreshing over at Digg to watch the Digg number increase. And the comments begin flooding in, and I do mean that it is a flood, both at Digg and at the blog.
Much has been written lately about the quality of Digg traffic and what happens after, these are my observations on the Digg Effect.
The first thing I noticed was that the Digg traffic almost immediately propelled the blog to the front page of WordPress.com for most popular site of the day, most popular post and fastest growing blog. More traffic.
Second was that the Digg visitor comments were generally polite, and after reading some of the experiences written by others, I was expecting to get slammed for the blog template, content quality, etc.
Then I noticed the pingbacks, and the links from other blogs and this was at 4 a.m.
Other news aggregators started sending referrals and then del.icio.us traffic started coming in and then traffic from places like monitor.hr, popurls.com and Google reader. This is a modest little blog, two-three hundred uniques a day.
Emails started arriving, asking to translate the post into other languages. requesting typo fixes for comments, introductions, etc. The Digg count kept climbing. I was ecstatic when the Diggs topped one thousand.
Still wasn’t 9 a.m. By nine a.m. the post had 72 comments at the blog and around 90 at Digg.
Later, the story was submitted to Lifehacker, picked up by Gizmodo, Netvibes was sending traffic, poil.ca, and on and on. Backlinks were still piling up. Currently, the little article has garnered 2057 Diggs.
Quite a lot has been written about the quality of Digg traffic, most of it not positive. Here are my thoughts;
First, I need to dispense with the word ‘traffic’, it is real people showing up, not bots. These people are just like you and I, they have diverse interests and they use the Web. They like to be heard and they aren’t afraid to voice their opinions.
Here’s what I noticed.
Digg visitors are focused on the article at hand, they don’t click around much. That post got 73,169 views that day. The next most popular post received 69. Yep, 69.
What about outbound clicks? Here are the top 10 outbound clicks for that day:
The EnginePuller site is linked from a comment on the post. That next stat is interesting, that’s the subscription button for my feed. Compare that to the Google Reader stat for that day: google.com/reader/view 788
What about after the Digg visitors start tapering off?
Here’s the total referral info since the 7th.
75,865 on the 7th
20,503 on the 8th
3,815 on the 9th.
Google reader for the 8th, google.com/reader/view 753
Google Reader For the 9th, google.com/reader/view 124
Alexa’s rather humorous chart: http://www.alexa.com/data/details/traffic_details?q=speakingfreely.wordpress.com&url=speakingfreely.wordpress.com
I haven’t finished looking at backlink data, but I do know that I stopped counting at over 300 hundred and that the number of backlinks is still climbing.
Is there value in getting Dugg? Certainly is. Some of that value resides in the experience itself but the most tangible value is the increase in exposure and the connections that are made. I’m still trading emails with people that I would never have met, I’m finding blogs that have useful information that I may have never seen and virtually meeting the people that write those blogs.
What have a learned about Digg visitors? They stay pretty focused on the reason they arrived, they like to comment and while they may not read many other posts on the site, they certainly read the article they came to read. Do some of them miss the point or disagree with what you wrote? Sure, but that happens at every forum I’ve ever participated in and in every conversation that has more than one person talking. ; )
If nearly 75,000 people show up in one place, there’s bound to be some differences of opinion and a little chaos. The experience is certainly worthwhile though.
If anyone would like to see more comprehensive stats, shoot me an email and I’ll send what I have.
What People Are Saying
- health on Five Things To Do With A PC When You Have No Internet Connection
- Home Life Preserver - Easy Home Bar Plans on Ditech’s “People Are Smart” Commercial Was A Smart Move
- Asif on Daytipper – Pay Per Post? Get Paid For A Tip.
- Simran on Daytipper – Pay Per Post? Get Paid For A Tip.
- Sofia on Daytipper – Pay Per Post? Get Paid For A Tip.
- Sonia on Daytipper – Pay Per Post? Get Paid For A Tip.
- Shyna Sabrawal on Daytipper – Pay Per Post? Get Paid For A Tip.
- Ankita Verma on WebmasterWorld Launches Social Media Tagging and Bookmarking Optimization Forum
- Sonia Pandey on WebmasterWorld Launches Social Media Tagging and Bookmarking Optimization Forum
- a on WebmasterWorld Launches Social Media Tagging and Bookmarking Optimization Forum
People Are Interested In
- disambiguate: Dictionary.com Word of the Day July 30, 2014disambiguate: to remove the ambiguity from.
- disambiguate: Dictionary.com Word of the Day July 30, 2014
- Eleanor Roosevelt"It is not fair to ask of others what you are not willing to do yourself."
- Eleanor Roosevelt
- ag-gag July 30, 2014ag-gag adj. Relating to laws that criminalize the taking of undercover photos and videos in certain businesses. Also: ag gag. Example Citations: “Ag-gag” laws have spread rapidly, and half a dozen states have made it illegal to film factory farms. The agriculture industry wants to bring ag-gag to Australia. —Will Potter, “Australia risks copying US ‘ag-gag’ […]
- poor door July 29, 2014poor door n. A separate entrance for the lower-income residents of a mixed-income building. Example Citations: A Guardian investigation has discovered a growing trend in the capital’s upmarket apartment blocks — which are required to include affordable homes in order to win planning permission — for the poorer residents to be forced to use alternative access […]
- jerktech July 25, 2014jerktech n. Technology that encourages or monetizes antisocial behavior, particularly the selling of goods or services that users don’t own. Also: jerk tech. Example Citations: Jerktech is the very apt epithet for the class of “disruptive” startups that sell things that don’t belong to them, like parking spots and restaurant reservations, simply raising the […]
- scanxiety July 24, 2014scanxiety n. Mental distress felt while awaiting the results of a medical test, particularly an MRI or CT scan. Also: scan-xiety. [scan + anxiety] Example Citations: And as traumatic as it can be, scanxiety is better than the alternative: being dead, so there’s nothing to test, and no odds to wonder about. —Xeni Jardin, “Scanxiety, or how waiting for cancer […]
- canvas fingerprinting July 23, 2014canvas fingerprinting n. A technique for tracking a user online that involves drawing a hidden element on the browser canvas to create a token that uniquely identifies the user’s computer. —canvas fingerprint n. Example Citations: First documented in a forthcoming paper by researchers at Princeton University and KU Leuven University in Belgium, this type of […]
- parasite building July 22, 2014parasite building n. A small building or structure that has been added to an existing, larger building, particularly when the styles of the two structures are noticeably different. Also: parasite, parasite structure, parasite office. Example Citations: Small-scale densification: Alternatives such as tiny laneway houses and ‘parasite’ buildings are popping up […]
- dogochondriac July 18, 2014dogochondriac n. A person who is excessively preoccupied by their dog’s health, or who tends to imagine ailments that the dog does not actually have. [dog + hypochondriac] Example Citations: Sooo... basically the vets say they can‘t see anything wrong with him, so maybe I’m just being a dogochondriac, but they do tend to miss things unless they are very obvi […]
- pinkification July 17, 2014pinkification n. The attempt to make something that is traditionally masculine more interesting or appealing to women by associating it with stereotypically feminine traits or ideas. Also: pink-ification. Example Citations: Yet, examples of tech’s pinkification persist. In February, at a Harvard event designed to get women interested in computer science, spo […]
- summer melt July 16, 2014summer melt n. College-bound students who renege on their commitment to a particular school, especially during the time between high school graduation and the start of classes. Example Citations: Education researchers and academic counselors call it “summer melt,” the precarious time when some college-bound students fall through the cracks, at risk of abando […]
- couch-cushion change July 15, 2014couch-cushion change n. A trivial or disappointingly small amount of money. Also: couch cushion change. Example Citations: His Department of Environment and Natural Resources has repeatedly thwarted efforts by environmental groups to hold Duke Energy responsible for its malfeasance in several such spills. For example, the DENR “punished” Duke for the Ashevil […]
- ag-gag July 30, 2014
More Blog Stuff