I cringe when I read that a group of people may be ‘impacted’ by a hurricane or politics, or for that matter, that anyone may be impacted. I know that a wisdom tooth may become impacted, but my OED says nothing about people being ‘impacted’.
Does anyone know when ‘impacted’ gained favor over ‘affected’? Or why?
April 8, 2008 at 4:07 pm
Ha! Thank you for posting this. I noticed this a long, long time ago.
I think ‘impact’ can be correctly used as a verb, it’s just been in the last 10 years or so that people have been doing it.
Another few usage things I’ve noticed:
- pronouncing the word ‘harass’ in the British way, with the the emphasis on the first syllable;
- everyone being called Mr. ________ no matter how many times their name is repeated.
April 8, 2008 at 7:41 pm
Hello Todd,
Just seems to me that it’s one of those ‘political’ words. Bigger ‘impact’ if you will. Sounds much worse than ‘affected’. Much like a virus used to be called an epidemic, but now, ‘pandemic’ gets the juice. ;)
April 13, 2008 at 7:01 pm
1. While impact, the verb, is more commonly used for physical collisions than affect is, impact, the noun, is used more broadly to describe something that profoundly affects many people. On the other hand, the noun “affect” encompasses more touchy-feely and wishy-washy connotations. Modern media’s love affair with verbing nouns makes them reach for the noun with more punch.
2. Fewer and fewer people have mastered the difference between affect and effect, so they use the plural mongoose dodge: “send me a mongoose, and while you’re at it, send me another.”
April 14, 2008 at 8:10 am
It’s a new word ;) You know what these business types are like. Describing the same concept over and over again is mind-numbingly dull, so using more punchy words incorrectly is rewarded. Heaven forbid anyone choose to use the passive voice once in a while and say “had an impact upon” - nobody can concentrate through four words!